<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the web used to need Flash (and might not need it anymore)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apdevblog.com/why-the-web-used-to-need-flash-and-might-not-need-it-anymore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apdevblog.com/why-the-web-used-to-need-flash-and-might-not-need-it-anymore/</link>
	<description>flash and actioscript development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 09:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lsyre</title>
		<link>http://apdevblog.com/why-the-web-used-to-need-flash-and-might-not-need-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>lsyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apdevblog.com/?p=767#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>Actually, i don&#039;t see the point in discussing the whole Flash vs HTML5 stuff (again). Apple has set a standard in leaving Flash behind. None of the (happy) iOS-Device owners is really complaining about the lack of video and banner ads. Just look at Youtube and Facebook: HTML5 is the new de facto standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, i don&#8217;t see the point in discussing the whole Flash vs HTML5 stuff (again). Apple has set a standard in leaving Flash behind. None of the (happy) iOS-Device owners is really complaining about the lack of video and banner ads. Just look at Youtube and Facebook: HTML5 is the new de facto standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jobSucker</title>
		<link>http://apdevblog.com/why-the-web-used-to-need-flash-and-might-not-need-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>jobSucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 16:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apdevblog.com/?p=767#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>lol - from your article it sounds like someone has drunk the apple cool aid.

if you&#039;ve got an apple shaped hole in your heart then no fact or argument or list of statistics is gonna help reintroduce you to the real world

but hey best of luck dude- you&#039;re gonna need it! lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol &#8211; from your article it sounds like someone has drunk the apple cool aid.</p>
<p>if you&#8217;ve got an apple shaped hole in your heart then no fact or argument or list of statistics is gonna help reintroduce you to the real world</p>
<p>but hey best of luck dude- you&#8217;re gonna need it! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://apdevblog.com/why-the-web-used-to-need-flash-and-might-not-need-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1007</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apdevblog.com/?p=767#comment-1007</guid>
		<description>I think Grant summed it up pretty well:
http://www.gskinner.com/blog/archives/2010/02/my_thoughts_on.html

let&#039;s just wait and see ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Grant summed it up pretty well:<br />
<a href="http://www.gskinner.com/blog/archives/2010/02/my_thoughts_on.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.gskinner.com/blog/archives/2010/02/my_thoughts_on.html'>http://www.gskinner.com/blog/archives/2010/02/my_thoughts_on.html</a></p>
<p>let&#8217;s just wait and see &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorian</title>
		<link>http://apdevblog.com/why-the-web-used-to-need-flash-and-might-not-need-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apdevblog.com/?p=767#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>Hey Aron, good writeup! I just think that even if the hardware of the iPad was powerful enough it wouldn&#039;t necessarily mean that Flash would &quot;work&quot; in mobile Safari. E.g. Safari uses some logic to guess which link you wanted to click when you tap on the screen, so you don&#039;t miss it with your clumsy fingers. That would probably not work inside a Plugin. Another thing is that you don&#039;t have a mouse over state, and many Flash interfaces rely on it.  It wouldn&#039;t have been a good experience anyway. 

I wrote down my two cents on this yesterday as well, leave me a comment!

Cheers, Dorian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Aron, good writeup! I just think that even if the hardware of the iPad was powerful enough it wouldn&#8217;t necessarily mean that Flash would &#8220;work&#8221; in mobile Safari. E.g. Safari uses some logic to guess which link you wanted to click when you tap on the screen, so you don&#8217;t miss it with your clumsy fingers. That would probably not work inside a Plugin. Another thing is that you don&#8217;t have a mouse over state, and many Flash interfaces rely on it.  It wouldn&#8217;t have been a good experience anyway. </p>
<p>I wrote down my two cents on this yesterday as well, leave me a comment!</p>
<p>Cheers, Dorian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens Franke</title>
		<link>http://apdevblog.com/why-the-web-used-to-need-flash-and-might-not-need-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens Franke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apdevblog.com/?p=767#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>@Aron: I would like to use the handshake icon from Skype. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aron: I would like to use the handshake icon from Skype. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aron</title>
		<link>http://apdevblog.com/why-the-web-used-to-need-flash-and-might-not-need-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>Aron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apdevblog.com/?p=767#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>@Sven I admit, that I&#039;m mixing up two things here. I share the critic on closed ecosystem (the gatekeeper issue) like described &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2010/01/28/some-personal-thoughts-on-apple-and-the-trend-towards-closed-platforms/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/0,1518,673182,00.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; (german). This can block innovations in long term.

However, as Jens correctly said, this is (sadly) a good thing for normal users, especially when they&#039;re not tech-guys. The normal user simply do not care. The normal user want to have a stable, easy to use system. The normal user has no need to customize the system, like we do. The normal user just want to have it worked out.

Maybe a compromise would be to have a super easy to use OS like MacOS with still all rights on the system (highly customizable) and besides that an AppStore with reviewed and certificated Apps for normal users.

Also, I fully agree with Jens, Apple has the far better tools. I know, not 100% comparable to Adobe, since different target systems, but still. Apple made a hell of a job, by giving the developer tools, that almost automatically end up in well designed and well to use applications. 

Adobe missed that train. Adobe put all their focus on technology. Missing, that the majority of users don&#039;t care about features, what they do care about is user experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sven I admit, that I&#8217;m mixing up two things here. I share the critic on closed ecosystem (the gatekeeper issue) like described <a href="http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2010/01/28/some-personal-thoughts-on-apple-and-the-trend-towards-closed-platforms/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/0,1518,673182,00.html">here</a> (german). This can block innovations in long term.</p>
<p>However, as Jens correctly said, this is (sadly) a good thing for normal users, especially when they&#8217;re not tech-guys. The normal user simply do not care. The normal user want to have a stable, easy to use system. The normal user has no need to customize the system, like we do. The normal user just want to have it worked out.</p>
<p>Maybe a compromise would be to have a super easy to use OS like MacOS with still all rights on the system (highly customizable) and besides that an AppStore with reviewed and certificated Apps for normal users.</p>
<p>Also, I fully agree with Jens, Apple has the far better tools. I know, not 100% comparable to Adobe, since different target systems, but still. Apple made a hell of a job, by giving the developer tools, that almost automatically end up in well designed and well to use applications. </p>
<p>Adobe missed that train. Adobe put all their focus on technology. Missing, that the majority of users don&#8217;t care about features, what they do care about is user experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Why the web used to need Flash (and might not need it anymore) - aron / philipp development blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://apdevblog.com/why-the-web-used-to-need-flash-and-might-not-need-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Why the web used to need Flash (and might not need it anymore) - aron / philipp development blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apdevblog.com/?p=767#comment-999</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by HowDo.us, Aron Woost and Little Buddha, Philipp Kyeck. Philipp Kyeck said: RT @aronwoost: Just blogged: My two cents on the iPad / Flash discussion http://bit.ly/cQgTet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by HowDo.us, Aron Woost and Little Buddha, Philipp Kyeck. Philipp Kyeck said: RT @aronwoost: Just blogged: My two cents on the iPad / Flash discussion <a href="http://bit.ly/cQgTet" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://bit.ly/cQgTet'>http://bit.ly/cQgTet</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://apdevblog.com/why-the-web-used-to-need-flash-and-might-not-need-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apdevblog.com/?p=767#comment-997</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by aronwoost: Just blogged: My two cents on the iPad / Flash discussion http://bit.ly/cQgTet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by aronwoost: Just blogged: My two cents on the iPad / Flash discussion <a href="http://bit.ly/cQgTet.." rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://bit.ly/cQgTet'>http://bit.ly/cQgTet</a>...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens Franke</title>
		<link>http://apdevblog.com/why-the-web-used-to-need-flash-and-might-not-need-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens Franke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apdevblog.com/?p=767#comment-995</guid>
		<description>From my perspective Flash is standing still for more then one year now. 

My main problem with Flash are usability issues and I don&#039;t think that Adobe will work on this topic in the near future. My second problem is that I can&#039;t see a real strategy behind all this new products. Currently most of them are no products for productions - most of them are buggy beta stuff.

My first job with XCode, Cocoa and the iPhone SDK was a really nice experience. Apple offer such a great UI-Framework and I also like the Interface Builder. I really like the focus on usability and simplicity and that&#039;s also an important point from a user perspective. 

And sure as developer I don&#039;t like the Gateway-Keeper politics, but for me as a user it isn&#039;t such a big thing. Will this politics kill innovation? Maybe yes, but in a really short time the App Store is full of great applications and innovations.

A long time ago, Adobe release Flash Lite ... and it&#039;s hard to see that Adobe miss some things: A distribution model, which is usable for users.

Cheers 
Jens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my perspective Flash is standing still for more then one year now. </p>
<p>My main problem with Flash are usability issues and I don&#8217;t think that Adobe will work on this topic in the near future. My second problem is that I can&#8217;t see a real strategy behind all this new products. Currently most of them are no products for productions &#8211; most of them are buggy beta stuff.</p>
<p>My first job with XCode, Cocoa and the iPhone SDK was a really nice experience. Apple offer such a great UI-Framework and I also like the Interface Builder. I really like the focus on usability and simplicity and that&#8217;s also an important point from a user perspective. </p>
<p>And sure as developer I don&#8217;t like the Gateway-Keeper politics, but for me as a user it isn&#8217;t such a big thing. Will this politics kill innovation? Maybe yes, but in a really short time the App Store is full of great applications and innovations.</p>
<p>A long time ago, Adobe release Flash Lite &#8230; and it&#8217;s hard to see that Adobe miss some things: A distribution model, which is usable for users.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Jens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven Busse</title>
		<link>http://apdevblog.com/why-the-web-used-to-need-flash-and-might-not-need-it-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven Busse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apdevblog.com/?p=767#comment-994</guid>
		<description>Hi,

&quot;Adobe set a proprietary industry standard with Flash (perfectly described by Ryan here) and now Apple (tries to) set a new proprietary industry standard with their platform.&quot;

Come on, you can&#039;t compare that. The first one provided a platform, that you could use to enhance the web experience. The second one is trying to dictate, how you experience the web, if you&#039;re into apple products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>&#8220;Adobe set a proprietary industry standard with Flash (perfectly described by Ryan here) and now Apple (tries to) set a new proprietary industry standard with their platform.&#8221;</p>
<p>Come on, you can&#8217;t compare that. The first one provided a platform, that you could use to enhance the web experience. The second one is trying to dictate, how you experience the web, if you&#8217;re into apple products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

